Culver's, Chocolate, Waffle Cone, 3 Scoops
Culver's, Chocolate, Waffle Cone, 3 Scoops by Culver's provides 814 kcal per 100 g, with 79 g of sugars and 15 g of protein. That is 170% more sugar than the average product in this category. Its Nutri-Score is E. It is listed in the Desserts category and comes in a 1 serving(s) pack.
Nutrient levels per 100 g
Levels use UK front-of-pack reference thresholds.
Nutrition facts
Serving size: 100g
| Nutrient | Per 100 g | Per serving | % DV* | Category avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 814 kcal | 814 kcal | 292 +178% | |
| Total fat | 38 g | 38 g | 49% | 14.2 +167% |
| Saturated fat | 21.5 g | 21.5 g | 108% | 7.9 +171% |
| Total sugars | 79 g | 79 g | 29.3 +170% | |
| Dietary fiber | 3 g | 3 g | 11% | 1.6 +85% |
| Protein | 15 g | 15 g | 30% | 4.9 +208% |
| Salt | 0.7 g | 0.7 g | 0.8 −16% |
*% Daily Value for a serving, based on a 2,000-calorie diet (FDA reference values). Category average across 3370 Desserts products on Foodmetria.
Compared with other desserts
Bar shows the share of products in this category that contain less of the nutrient.
Ingredients
undefined
Product details
- Quantity
- 1 serving(s)
- Serving size
- 100g
- Sold in
- United States
- Barcode
- 300871141790243538
Prices reported by shoppers
Loading prices…
Frequently asked questions
How many calories are in Culver's, Chocolate, Waffle Cone, 3 Scoops?
Culver's, Chocolate, Waffle Cone, 3 Scoops contains 814 kcal per 100 g and about 814 kcal per serving (100g).
How much sugar is in Culver's, Chocolate, Waffle Cone, 3 Scoops?
Culver's, Chocolate, Waffle Cone, 3 Scoops has 79 g of sugars per 100 g, which is considered high by UK front-of-pack guidelines.
Is Culver's, Chocolate, Waffle Cone, 3 Scoops healthy?
It has a Nutri-Score of E (A is best, E is worst). Scores describe nutritional quality and processing, not suitability for your individual diet.
Source: Open Food Facts (ODbL). Last updated February 20, 2025. Spotted a mistake? Edit this product on Open Food Facts. Not medical advice — always check the package label.
Reviews
Compare & rankings
Healthier alternatives
Best in category →Same category, meaningfully better on at least one measure and no worse on the others. Each card shows what improves.
a NOVA 4 
a 
a NOVA 4 
a NOVA 4 More desserts
View all →
c NOVA 4 
c NOVA 3 
c 
c 
c NOVA 4 
c NOVA 4