Nutrition report ready

Chocolate a la taza

Calories, Nutri-Score, processing level, additives, ingredients and shopper prices for this Eroski product.

Nutri-Score E

View details

Chocolate a la taza

by Eroski in Chocolates Barcode 8480010004830
Bad nutritional quality

Chocolate a la taza by Eroski provides 515 kcal per 100 g, with 51 g of sugars and 4.6 g of protein. That is 16% more sugar than the average product in this category. Its Nutri-Score is E. It is listed in the Chocolates category.

Nutrient levels per 100 g

Fat
27 g · High
Saturated fat
17 g · High
Sugars
51 g · High
Salt
0 g · Low

Levels use UK front-of-pack reference thresholds.

Nutrition facts

Nutrient Per 100 g Category avg
Calories 515 kcal 531
Total fat 27 g 33.2 −19%
Saturated fat 17 g 18.8 −9%
Carbohydrates 61 g 50.3 +21%
Total sugars 51 g 43.9 +16%
Protein 4.6 g 6.7 −31%
Salt 0 g 0.2 −100%

Category average across 4192 Chocolates products on Foodmetria.

Compared with other chocolates

Calories lower 23%
Sugars higher 38%
Salt lower 1%
Saturated fat lower 28%
Protein top 86%

Bar shows the share of products in this category that contain less of the nutrient.

Product details

Sold in
Spain
Barcode
8480010004830

Prices reported by shoppers

Loading prices…

Frequently asked questions

How many calories are in Chocolate a la taza?

Chocolate a la taza contains 515 kcal per 100 g.

How much sugar is in Chocolate a la taza?

Chocolate a la taza has 51 g of sugars per 100 g, which is considered high by UK front-of-pack guidelines.

Is Chocolate a la taza healthy?

It has a Nutri-Score of E (A is best, E is worst). Scores describe nutritional quality and processing, not suitability for your individual diet.

Source: Open Food Facts (ODbL). Last updated March 27, 2026. Spotted a mistake? Edit this product on Open Food Facts. Not medical advice — always check the package label.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tried Chocolate a la taza? Be the first to share how it tastes.

Write a review

Your rating

Reviews are moderated. See our Privacy Policy.

Compare & rankings

Healthier alternatives

Best in category →

Same category, meaningfully better on at least one measure and no worse on the others. Each card shows what improves.

More chocolates

View all →

More from Eroski

View all →