View full-size photo · Photo: Open Food Facts contributors, CC BY-SA
Boondi хрустящие шарики из нутовой муки
Boondi хрустящие шарики из нутовой муки by Boondi provides 569 kcal per 100 g, with 1.4 g of sugars and 10.6 g of protein. That is 93% less sugar than the average product in this category. Its Nutri-Score is E. It is listed in the Snacks category and comes in a 140 g pack.
Nutrient levels per 100 g
Levels use UK front-of-pack reference thresholds.
Nutrition facts
Serving size: 30 g
| Nutrient | Per 100 g | Per serving | % DV* | Category avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 569 kcal | 171 kcal | 453 +26% | |
| Total fat | 40.4 g | 12.1 g | 16% | 25.3 +60% |
| Saturated fat | 10.1 g | 3 g | 15% | 6.8 +49% |
| Carbohydrates | 40.8 g | 12.2 g | 4% | 48.9 −17% |
| Total sugars | 1.4 g | 0.4 g | 18.7 −93% | |
| Protein | 10.6 g | 3.2 g | 6% | 13.3 −20% |
| Salt | 2.2 g | 0.7 g | 1.1 +101% |
*% Daily Value for a serving, based on a 2,000-calorie diet (FDA reference values). Category average across 35680 Snacks products on Foodmetria.
Compared with other snacks
Bar shows the share of products in this category that contain less of the nutrient.
Product details
- Quantity
- 140 g
- Serving size
- 30 g
- Sold in
- France
- Barcode
- 8901414002555
Prices reported by shoppers
Loading prices…
Frequently asked questions
How many calories are in Boondi хрустящие шарики из нутовой муки?
Boondi хрустящие шарики из нутовой муки contains 569 kcal per 100 g and about 171 kcal per serving (30 g).
How much sugar is in Boondi хрустящие шарики из нутовой муки?
Boondi хрустящие шарики из нутовой муки has 1.4 g of sugars per 100 g, which is considered low by UK front-of-pack guidelines.
Is Boondi хрустящие шарики из нутовой муки healthy?
It has a Nutri-Score of E (A is best, E is worst). Scores describe nutritional quality and processing, not suitability for your individual diet.
Source: Open Food Facts (ODbL). Last updated October 2, 2026. Spotted a mistake? Edit this product on Open Food Facts. Not medical advice — always check the package label.
Reviews
Compare & rankings
Healthier alternatives
Best in category →Same category, meaningfully better on at least one measure and no worse on the others. Each card shows what improves.
a NOVA 3 
a NOVA 4 
a NOVA 3 
a NOVA 1 More snacks
View all →
c NOVA 4 
d NOVA 3 
d NOVA 4 
e NOVA 3 
c NOVA 4 
c NOVA 4