View full-size photo · Photo: Open Food Facts contributors, CC BY-SA
B+C+E frutti di bosco
B+C+E frutti di bosco by Pfanner provides 43 kcal per 100 ml, with 10 g of sugars and 0.5 g of protein. That is 15% more sugar than the average product in this category. Its Nutri-Score is E and it is classified as NOVA 4 (ultra-processed food). It is listed in the Fruit juices from concentrate category and comes in a 1.5 litri pack.
Nutrient levels per 100 ml
Levels use UK front-of-pack reference thresholds for drinks.
Nutrition facts
| Nutrient | Per 100 ml | Category avg |
|---|---|---|
| Calories | 43 kcal | 40 +8% |
| Total fat | 0.5 g | 0.1 +255% |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0 +219% |
| Carbohydrates | 10 g | 9.3 +8% |
| Total sugars | 10 g | 8.7 +15% |
| Added sugars | 5 g | 2.6 +94% |
| Protein | 0.5 g | 0.3 +95% |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.1 −88% |
*% Daily Value for 100 ml, based on a 2,000-calorie diet (FDA reference values). Category average across 214 Fruit juices from concentrate products on Foodmetria.
Compared with other fruit juices from concentrate
Bar shows the share of products in this category that contain less of the nutrient.
Ingredients
Acqua, succo di più frutti da concentrato (mela, uva, aronia, ribes nero, sambuco, fragola, lampone, mirtillo nero, mora), zucchero, acidificante acido citrico, aroma, vitamine (C, E, tiamina, B6, B12)
Additives 1
Overexposure risk is based on EFSA evaluations as recorded by Open Food Facts.
Product details
- Quantity
- 1.5 litri
- Labels & certifications
- No gluten
- Sold in
- Italy
- Barcode
- 9006900216092
Prices reported by shoppers
Loading prices…
Frequently asked questions
How many calories are in B+C+E frutti di bosco?
B+C+E frutti di bosco contains 43 kcal per 100 ml.
How much sugar is in B+C+E frutti di bosco?
B+C+E frutti di bosco has 10 g of sugars per 100 ml, which is considered moderate by UK front-of-pack guidelines.
Is B+C+E frutti di bosco healthy?
It has a Nutri-Score of E (A is best, E is worst); it is in NOVA group 4 — ultra-processed food. Scores describe nutritional quality and processing, not suitability for your individual diet.
Source: Open Food Facts (ODbL). Last updated March 30, 2026. Spotted a mistake? Edit this product on Open Food Facts. Not medical advice — always check the package label.
Reviews
Compare & rankings
Healthier alternatives
Best in category →Same category, meaningfully better on at least one measure and no worse on the others. Each card shows what improves.
b NOVA 3
b NOVA 1
b NOVA 1
b NOVA 1 More fruit juices from concentrate
View all →
d NOVA 4
c NOVA 1
e NOVA 4
d NOVA 1
c NOVA 1
d NOVA 4 More from Pfanner
View all →
d NOVA 4
d NOVA 4
d NOVA 4
d NOVA 4
e NOVA 3
e NOVA 4