Zuckerschrift vs Hagelslag puur
Overall, Zuckerschrift has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Zuckerschrift | Hagelslag puur |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 307 kcal | 441 kcal |
| Fat | 6.8 g | 15 g |
| Saturated fat | 5.8 g | 8.9 g |
| Sugars | 44 g | 65 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | — | 6.6 g |
| Protein | 0.4 g | 5.1 g |
| Additives | 4 | 1 |
| Allergens | Milk | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Zuckerschrift has 30% fewer calories (307 kcal vs 441 kcal).
- Zuckerschrift has 55% less fat (6.8 g vs 15 g).
- Zuckerschrift has 35% less saturated fat (5.8 g vs 8.9 g).
- Zuckerschrift has 32% less sugar (44 g vs 65 g).
- Hagelslag puur has 92% more protein (5.1 g vs 0.4 g).
- Only Zuckerschrift lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Zuckerschrift
Zucker, Glukosesirup, Wasser, Maltodextrin, Palmöl, SÜSSMOLKENPULVER, Emulgator (E 472a), Farbstoffe (E 120, E 100, E 131)
Hagelslag puur
Suiker, cacaomassa, magere cacaopoeder, dextrose, emulgator: raapzaadlecithine, glansmiddel: arabische gom, Chocoladehagelslag: ten minste 32% cacaobestanddelen,
FAQ
Which is healthier: Zuckerschrift or Hagelslag puur?
Overall, Zuckerschrift has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Zuckerschrift has fewer calories: 307 kcal versus 441 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Zuckerschrift has less sugar: 44 g versus 65 g per 100 g.