Zuckerschrift vs Pueblo London
Overall, Pueblo London has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Zuckerschrift | Pueblo London |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 307 kcal | 213 kcal |
| Fat | 6.8 g | 21.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 5.8 g | 6 g |
| Sugars | 44 g | 1 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 1.7 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 0.4 g | 5 g |
| Additives | 4 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pueblo London has 31% fewer calories (213 kcal vs 307 kcal).
- Zuckerschrift has 68% less fat (6.8 g vs 21.4 g).
- Pueblo London has 98% less sugar (1 g vs 44 g).
- Zuckerschrift has 96% less salt (0.1 g vs 1.7 g).
- Pueblo London has 92% more protein (5 g vs 0.4 g).
- Pueblo London has the better Nutri-Score.
- Pueblo London is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Zuckerschrift
Zucker, Glukosesirup, Wasser, Maltodextrin, Palmöl, SÜSSMOLKENPULVER, Emulgator (E 472a), Farbstoffe (E 120, E 100, E 131)
Pueblo London
Pasteurized whole milk, rennet, salt.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Zuckerschrift or Pueblo London?
Overall, Pueblo London has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pueblo London has fewer calories: 213 kcal versus 307 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pueblo London has less sugar: 1 g versus 44 g per 100 g.