Zero caffeine zero sugar vs Pop Cola Botanical, Zero, Îndulcit cu Stevia
Overall, Pop Cola Botanical, Zero, Îndulcit cu Stevia has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Zero caffeine zero sugar
Pop Cola Botanical, Zero, Îndulcit cu Stevia
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Zero caffeine zero sugar | Pop Cola Botanical, Zero, În... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | b |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 0 kcal | 1 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 5 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Ingredients
Zero caffeine zero sugar
Sprankelend water, kleurstof: E150d, voedingszuur: E338, zoetstoffen: aspartaam, acesulfaam-K, zuurteregelaar: E331, natuurlijke aroma's
Pop Cola Botanical, Zero, Îndulcit cu Stevia
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Zero caffeine zero sugar or Pop Cola Botanical, Zero, Îndulcit cu Stevia?
Overall, Pop Cola Botanical, Zero, Îndulcit cu Stevia has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Zero caffeine zero sugar has fewer calories: 0 kcal versus 1 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Zero caffeine zero sugar has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.