Pop Cola Botanical, Zero, Îndulcit cu Stevia vs Cola zero azúcar zero cafeína
Overall, Pop Cola Botanical, Zero, Îndulcit cu Stevia has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Pop Cola Botanical, Zero, Îndulcit cu Stevia
Cola zero azúcar zero cafeína
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pop Cola Botanical, Zero, În... | Cola zero azúcar zero cafeín... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | c |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 1 kcal | 1 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 0 | 5 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Ingredients
Pop Cola Botanical, Zero, Îndulcit cu Stevia
Not available.
Cola zero azúcar zero cafeína
Agua carbonatada, colorante e-150d, edulcorantes: ciclamato sódico, acesulfamo k y aspartamo, acidulante ácido fosfórico, aromas y corrector de acidez citrato sódico, contiene una fuente de fenilalanina,
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pop Cola Botanical, Zero, Îndulcit cu Stevia or Cola zero azúcar zero cafeína?
Overall, Pop Cola Botanical, Zero, Îndulcit cu Stevia has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Cola zero azúcar zero cafeína has fewer calories: 1 kcal versus 1 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pop Cola Botanical, Zero, Îndulcit cu Stevia has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.