Mini Coca-Cola Sans Sucres Sans caféine vs Pop Cola Botanical, Zero, Îndulcit cu Stevia
Overall, Pop Cola Botanical, Zero, Îndulcit cu Stevia has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Mini Coca-Cola Sans Sucres Sans caféine
Pop Cola Botanical, Zero, Îndulcit cu Stevia
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Mini Coca-Cola Sans Sucres S... | Pop Cola Botanical, Zero, În... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | b |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 0 kcal | 1 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 5 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Ingredients
Mini Coca-Cola Sans Sucres Sans caféine
Eau gazéifiée; colorant: E150d; acidifiant: acide phosphorique; édulcorants: aspartame, acésulfame-K; correcteur d'acidité : citrates de sodium; arômes naturels. Contient une source de phenylalanine.
Pop Cola Botanical, Zero, Îndulcit cu Stevia
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Mini Coca-Cola Sans Sucres Sans caféine or Pop Cola Botanical, Zero, Îndulcit cu Stevia?
Overall, Pop Cola Botanical, Zero, Îndulcit cu Stevia has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Mini Coca-Cola Sans Sucres Sans caféine has fewer calories: 0 kcal versus 1 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Mini Coca-Cola Sans Sucres Sans caféine has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.