Würzfee vs HAK Junge Erbsen mit Möhren
Overall, HAK Junge Erbsen mit Möhren has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Würzfee | HAK Junge Erbsen mit Möhren |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 169 kcal | 49 kcal |
| Fat | 2.2 g | 0.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.3 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 16 g | 3.1 g |
| Salt | 50.2 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | — | 3.6 g |
| Protein | 3.9 g | 2.2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Celery | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- HAK Junge Erbsen mit Möhren has 71% fewer calories (49 kcal vs 169 kcal).
- HAK Junge Erbsen mit Möhren has 91% less fat (0.2 g vs 2.2 g).
- HAK Junge Erbsen mit Möhren has 81% less sugar (3.1 g vs 16 g).
- HAK Junge Erbsen mit Möhren has 100% less salt (0.1 g vs 50.2 g).
- Würzfee has 44% more protein (3.9 g vs 2.2 g).
- HAK Junge Erbsen mit Möhren has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Würzfee lists: Celery.
Ingredients
Würzfee
Steinsalz, getrocknetes Gemüse in veränderlichen Gewichtsanteilen 21% (Karotten*, Zwiebeln, Pastinaken, Sellerie*, Lauch*, Shiitakepilze", Petersilienwurzeln"), Maismehl", getrocknete Äpfel 5%, getrocknete Kräuter in veränderlichen Gewichtsanteilen 4% (Petersilie, Liebstöckel"), Sonnenblumenöl* 1%, Curcuma*, *aus kontrolliert ökologischem Anbau
HAK Junge Erbsen mit Möhren
Erbsen, Möhrchen, Wasser, Meersalz
FAQ
Which is healthier: Würzfee or HAK Junge Erbsen mit Möhren?
Overall, HAK Junge Erbsen mit Möhren has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
HAK Junge Erbsen mit Möhren has fewer calories: 49 kcal versus 169 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
HAK Junge Erbsen mit Möhren has less sugar: 3.1 g versus 16 g per 100 g.