WR blue cheese dressing vs Hvitløksdressing
Overall, Hvitløksdressing has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | WR blue cheese dressing | Hvitløksdressing |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 598 kcal | 546 kcal |
| Fat | 61.2 g | 59.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 5.3 g | 4.4 g |
| Sugars | 6.9 g | 1 g |
| Salt | 3.7 g | 0.6 g |
| Fiber | 1.7 g | — |
| Protein | 1.4 g | 0.6 g |
| Additives | 2 | 5 |
| Allergens | Eggs, Milk | Eggs, Mustard |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Hvitløksdressing has 17% less saturated fat (4.4 g vs 5.3 g).
- Hvitløksdressing has 86% less sugar (1 g vs 6.9 g).
- Hvitløksdressing has 84% less salt (0.6 g vs 3.7 g).
- WR blue cheese dressing has 57% more protein (1.4 g vs 0.6 g).
- Hvitløksdressing has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only WR blue cheese dressing lists: Milk.
- Only Hvitløksdressing lists: Mustard.
Ingredients
WR blue cheese dressing
Rapeseed oil (60%), white wine vinegar (13%), water, sugar, BLUE CHEESE POWDER (4%) (blue cheese (milk), salt, emulsifier sodium phosphates). pasteurised free range egg yolk, salt, concentrated lemon juice, cheese flavouring (contains milk), stabiliser xanthan gum
Hvitløksdressing
Rapsolje, vann, hvitløk 5%, eggeplomme, eddik, sitronsaft, sukker, sennepsfrø, stabilisator (guarkjememel, xantangummi), salt, persille, konserveringsmiddel (kaliumsorbat, natriumbenzoat). surhetsregulerende middel (eplesyre, sitronsyre), naturlig aroma. cayennepepper.
FAQ
Which is healthier: WR blue cheese dressing or Hvitløksdressing?
Overall, Hvitløksdressing has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Hvitløksdressing has fewer calories: 546 kcal versus 598 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Hvitløksdressing has less sugar: 1 g versus 6.9 g per 100 g.