Comparison

Classic french dressing vs Hvitløksdressing

Overall, Hvitløksdressing has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientClassic french dressingHvitløksdressing
Nutri-Score d d
NOVA group 3 4
Calories 650 kcal 546 kcal
Fat 70.3 g 59.8 g
Saturated fat 8.2 g 4.4 g
Sugars 2.8 g 1 g
Salt 0.4 g 0.6 g
Fiber 0.6 g —
Protein 0.4 g 0.6 g
Additives05
AllergensMustardEggs, Mustard

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Hvitløksdressing has 16% fewer calories (546 kcal vs 650 kcal).
  • Hvitløksdressing has 15% less fat (59.8 g vs 70.3 g).
  • Hvitløksdressing has 46% less saturated fat (4.4 g vs 8.2 g).
  • Hvitløksdressing has 64% less sugar (1 g vs 2.8 g).
  • Classic french dressing is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Hvitløksdressing lists: Eggs.

Ingredients

Classic french dressing

Sunflower Oil (51%) SET (EU), Extra Virgin Olive Oil (28%), Grape NAD Must, White Wine Vinegar, Dijon Mustard, PLAC Garlic (1%), Sea Salt, Cracked Black Pepper ONCE For allergens please see ingredients in bold. REFRIC AND CO

Hvitløksdressing

Rapsolje, vann, hvitløk 5%, eggeplomme, eddik, sitronsaft, sukker, sennepsfrø, stabilisator (guarkjememel, xantangummi), salt, persille, konserveringsmiddel (kaliumsorbat, natriumbenzoat). surhetsregulerende middel (eplesyre, sitronsyre), naturlig aroma. cayennepepper.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Classic french dressing or Hvitløksdressing?

Overall, Hvitløksdressing has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Hvitløksdressing has fewer calories: 546 kcal versus 650 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Hvitløksdressing has less sugar: 1 g versus 2.8 g per 100 g.

More comparisons