Comparison
Woudhoning vs Aromatischer Waldhonig flüssig
Overall, Woudhoning has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Woudhoning | Aromatischer Waldhonig flüss... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 306 kcal | 282 kcal |
| Fat | 0.1 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 69.8 g | 70 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0.1 g | — |
| Protein | 0.4 g | 0.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Waldhonig |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Woudhoning has 80% less fat (0.1 g vs 0.5 g).
- Only Aromatischer Waldhonig flüssig lists: Waldhonig.
Ingredients
Woudhoning
Honing (honingdauwhoning),
Aromatischer Waldhonig flüssig
_Waldhonig_ flüssig
FAQ
Which is healthier: Woudhoning or Aromatischer Waldhonig flüssig?
Overall, Woudhoning has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Aromatischer Waldhonig flüssig has fewer calories: 282 kcal versus 306 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Woudhoning has less sugar: 69.8 g versus 70 g per 100 g.