Winterbock vs Nordic
Overall, Winterbock has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Winterbock | Nordic |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 57 kcal | 19 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | — |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.2 g |
| Salt | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 0.6 g | 0.2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | Gluten | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Nordic has 67% fewer calories (19 kcal vs 57 kcal).
- Winterbock has 75% more protein (0.6 g vs 0.2 g).
- Winterbock is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Winterbock
Wasser, _Gerstenmalz_, Hopfen.
Nordic
Pant A BEER OBABLY MNOHOL 100% SMAG, MED FRISK AROMA OG EN SE CARLSBERG NORDIC OG NÅR ØLLEN ER BRYGGE DEN BEDSTE ØL, WER? PROB B 333 16D22621C ALKOHOLFRI BL, INGREDIENSER: VAND, BYGMALT, KULDIOXID, NATURLIGE AROMAER, HUMLEAROMAER OG HUMLE, ENERGI: 79 kJ/
FAQ
Which is healthier: Winterbock or Nordic?
Overall, Winterbock has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Nordic has fewer calories: 19 kcal versus 57 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Winterbock has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.2 g per 100 g.