Winterbock vs Special export
Overall, Winterbock has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Nutrient | Winterbock | Special export |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 57 kcal | 19 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 1.1 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.6 g |
| Protein | 0.6 g | 0.8 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Special export has 67% fewer calories (19 kcal vs 57 kcal).
- Winterbock has no sugar, while Special export has 1.1 g.
- Winterbock has no salt, while Special export has 0.6 g.
Ingredients
Winterbock
Wasser, _Gerstenmalz_, Hopfen.
Special export
eau, malt d'orge, orge torréfié, extrait de houblon, levure
FAQ
Which is healthier: Winterbock or Special export?
Overall, Winterbock has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Special export has fewer calories: 19 kcal versus 57 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Winterbock has less sugar: 0 g versus 1.1 g per 100 g.