Comparison

ERDINGER Pikantus vs Winterbock

Overall, Winterbock has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 ml

NutrientERDINGER PikantusWinterbock
Nutri-Score — —
NOVA group 3 3
Calories 63 kcal 57 kcal
Fat 0.5 g 0 g
Saturated fat 0.1 g 0 g
Sugars 0.5 g 0 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber 0 g —
Protein 0.9 g 0.6 g
Additives00
AllergensGluten, RöstmalzbierGluten

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Winterbock has no fat, while ERDINGER Pikantus has 0.5 g.
  • Winterbock has no sugar, while ERDINGER Pikantus has 0.5 g.
  • ERDINGER Pikantus has 33% more protein (0.9 g vs 0.6 g).
  • Only ERDINGER Pikantus lists: Röstmalzbier.

Ingredients

ERDINGER Pikantus

Wasser, _Weizenmalz_, _Gerstenmalz_, _Röstmalzbier_, Hopfen, Hefe

Winterbock

Wasser, _Gerstenmalz_, Hopfen.

FAQ

Which is healthier: ERDINGER Pikantus or Winterbock?

Overall, Winterbock has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Winterbock has fewer calories: 57 kcal versus 63 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Winterbock has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons