Wildschweingulasch vs Sanglier et champignon lait
Overall, Wildschweingulasch has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Wildschweingulasch | Sanglier et champignon lait |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 101 kcal | 684 kcal |
| Fat | 3.4 g | 64.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.9 g | 31.7 g |
| Sugars | 2.9 g | 15.1 g |
| Salt | 1.5 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | 0.5 g | 1.9 g |
| Protein | 11.4 g | 9.2 g |
| Additives | 3 | 2 |
| Allergens | Gluten, Milk, Mustard, Sulphur dioxide and sulphites | Milk, Nuts, Sesame seeds, Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Wildschweingulasch has 85% fewer calories (101 kcal vs 684 kcal).
- Wildschweingulasch has 95% less fat (3.4 g vs 64.6 g).
- Wildschweingulasch has 97% less saturated fat (0.9 g vs 31.7 g).
- Wildschweingulasch has 81% less sugar (2.9 g vs 15.1 g).
- Sanglier et champignon lait has 88% less salt (0.2 g vs 1.5 g).
- Sanglier et champignon lait has 74% more fiber (1.9 g vs 0.5 g).
- Wildschweingulasch has 19% more protein (11.4 g vs 9.2 g).
- Wildschweingulasch has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Wildschweingulasch lists: Gluten, Mustard, Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.
- Only Sanglier et champignon lait lists: Nuts, Sesame seeds, Soybeans.
Ingredients
Wildschweingulasch
Trinkwasser, 34% vorgegartes Wildschweinfleisch, Zwiebeln, modifizierte Stärke, 3% Rotwein (enthält Sulfite), Tomatenmark dreifach konzentriert, Trockenpflaumen (Pflaumen, Konservierungsstoff: Kaliumsorbat), Rapsöl, Sahne, 1% Portwein (enthält Sulfite), jodiertes Speisesalz (Speisesalz, Kaliumiodat), Traubensaftkonzentrat (enthält Sulfite), Gewürze (enthält Senf), Zucker, Weizenmehl, Branntweinessig, Karamellzucker, Dextrose, Milchpulver, Verdickungsmittel: Guarkernmehl; Kräuter.
Sanglier et champignon lait
Pâte de cacao 34 %, poudre de _lait_, beurre de cacao, lécithine de _soja_, _amandes_, sucre, _noisettes_, vanille, _sésame_.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Wildschweingulasch or Sanglier et champignon lait?
Overall, Wildschweingulasch has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Wildschweingulasch has fewer calories: 101 kcal versus 684 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Wildschweingulasch has less sugar: 2.9 g versus 15.1 g per 100 g.