Comparison

Wildschweinsalami vs Sanglier et champignon lait

Overall, Wildschweinsalami has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 3.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientWildschweinsalamiSanglier et champignon lait
Nutri-Score e d
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 406 kcal 684 kcal
Fat 25 g 64.6 g
Saturated fat 12.3 g 31.7 g
Sugars 0.1 g 15.1 g
Salt 4.9 g 0.2 g
Fiber — 1.9 g
Protein 27.8 g 9.2 g
Additives32
AllergensNone listedMilk, Nuts, Sesame seeds, Soybeans

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Wildschweinsalami has 41% fewer calories (406 kcal vs 684 kcal).
  • Wildschweinsalami has 61% less fat (25 g vs 64.6 g).
  • Wildschweinsalami has 61% less saturated fat (12.3 g vs 31.7 g).
  • Wildschweinsalami has 99% less sugar (0.1 g vs 15.1 g).
  • Sanglier et champignon lait has 97% less salt (0.2 g vs 4.9 g).
  • Wildschweinsalami has 67% more protein (27.8 g vs 9.2 g).
  • Sanglier et champignon lait has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Sanglier et champignon lait lists: Milk, Nuts, Sesame seeds, Soybeans.

Ingredients

Wildschweinsalami

WILDSCHWEINFLEISCH, SCHWEINEFLEISCH, SALZ, PFEFFER, NATÜRLICHE AROMEN, DEXTROSE, SACCHAROSE, ANTIOXIDATIONSMITTEL : ASCORBINSÄURE, KONSERVIERUNGSMITTEL NATRIUMNITRIT, KALIUMNITRAT.

Sanglier et champignon lait

Pâte de cacao 34 %, poudre de _lait_, beurre de cacao, lécithine de _soja_, _amandes_, sucre, _noisettes_, vanille, _sésame_.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Wildschweinsalami or Sanglier et champignon lait?

Overall, Wildschweinsalami has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Wildschweinsalami has fewer calories: 406 kcal versus 684 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Wildschweinsalami has less sugar: 0.1 g versus 15.1 g per 100 g.

More comparisons