Wild Blueberry Conserve vs Aprikosenmarmelade
Overall, Aprikosenmarmelade has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Wild Blueberry Conserve | Aprikosenmarmelade |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 241 kcal | 221 kcal |
| Fat | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 59 g | 52 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 1.5 g | 1.3 g |
| Protein | 0.3 g | 0.5 g |
| Additives | 1 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Aprikosenmarmelade has 12% less sugar (52 g vs 59 g).
Ingredients
Wild Blueberry Conserve
blueberries 50%, sugar, cane sugar, concentrated lemon juice, gelling agent (fruit pectin)
Aprikosenmarmelade
Zucker, Aprikosen, Zitronensaftkonzentrat, Geliermittel Pektine
FAQ
Which is healthier: Wild Blueberry Conserve or Aprikosenmarmelade?
Overall, Aprikosenmarmelade has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Aprikosenmarmelade has fewer calories: 221 kcal versus 241 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Aprikosenmarmelade has less sugar: 52 g versus 59 g per 100 g.