Comparison

Vermicelles chocolat noir vs Lays Butler Naturel

Overall, Vermicelles chocolat noir has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientVermicelles chocolat noirLays Butler Naturel
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 447 kcal 519 kcal
Fat 16 g 31 g
Saturated fat 9.3 g 3 g
Sugars 66 g 3.5 g
Salt 0 g 5.3 g
Fiber 6.3 g 0.7 g
Protein 4.9 g 5.4 g
Additives12
AllergensMilkGluten

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Vermicelles chocolat noir has 14% fewer calories (447 kcal vs 519 kcal).
  • Vermicelles chocolat noir has 48% less fat (16 g vs 31 g).
  • Lays Butler Naturel has 68% less saturated fat (3 g vs 9.3 g).
  • Lays Butler Naturel has 95% less sugar (3.5 g vs 66 g).
  • Vermicelles chocolat noir has 100% less salt (0 g vs 5.3 g).
  • Vermicelles chocolat noir has 89% more fiber (6.3 g vs 0.7 g).
  • Only Vermicelles chocolat noir lists: Milk.
  • Only Lays Butler Naturel lists: Gluten.

Ingredients

Vermicelles chocolat noir

Sucre, cacao maigre en poudre, pâte de cacao, beurre de cacao, émulsifiant (E322), LAIT entier en poudre. Cacao: 32% minimum

Lays Butler Naturel

Maismehl, Sonnenblumenöl, herzhafte Aromazubereitung [natürliches Aroma (enthält schwarzen Pfeffer), Zwiebelpulver, Säureregulatoren (Citronensäure, Natriumacetate), Knoblauchpulver, Farbstoff (Paprikaextrakt)], Salz, Zucker, Kann Soja und Weizen (Gluten enthalten,

FAQ

Which is healthier: Vermicelles chocolat noir or Lays Butler Naturel?

Overall, Vermicelles chocolat noir has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Vermicelles chocolat noir has fewer calories: 447 kcal versus 519 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Lays Butler Naturel has less sugar: 3.5 g versus 66 g per 100 g.

More comparisons