Velouté de potiron et châtaigne vs Crema de calabaza
Overall, Velouté de potiron et châtaigne has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Velouté de potiron et châtai... | Crema de calabaza |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | b |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 29 kcal | 36 kcal |
| Fat | 0.6 g | 1.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.3 g | 0.8 g |
| Sugars | 1.9 g | 2.7 g |
| Salt | 0.6 g | 0.7 g |
| Fiber | 1.4 g | 0.7 g |
| Protein | 0.5 g | 0.7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten, Milk, Nuts | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Velouté de potiron et châtaigne has 19% fewer calories (29 kcal vs 36 kcal).
- Velouté de potiron et châtaigne has 54% less fat (0.6 g vs 1.3 g).
- Velouté de potiron et châtaigne has 63% less saturated fat (0.3 g vs 0.8 g).
- Velouté de potiron et châtaigne has 30% less sugar (1.9 g vs 2.7 g).
- Velouté de potiron et châtaigne has 50% more fiber (1.4 g vs 0.7 g).
- Only Velouté de potiron et châtaigne lists: Gluten, Nuts.
Ingredients
Velouté de potiron et châtaigne
Eau,potiron 30%, carotte, pomme de terre, châtaignes 3,2%, purée de tomates, crème fraiche, sel, extrait naturel de poivre
Crema de calabaza
Agua, -, Proporción variable, 43., Almidón, Aceite de oliva 1., Mantequilla, -, Azúcar, -, Fresco y seco, Una vez, Abrir, -, -, Antes de, 2 días .Calabaza. Cebolla. Zanahoria. Patata.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Velouté de potiron et châtaigne or Crema de calabaza?
Overall, Velouté de potiron et châtaigne has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Velouté de potiron et châtaigne has fewer calories: 29 kcal versus 36 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Velouté de potiron et châtaigne has less sugar: 1.9 g versus 2.7 g per 100 g.