Bio velouté de potiron & graines de courge vs Velouté de potiron et châtaigne
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Bio velouté de potiron & graines de courge
Velouté de potiron et châtaigne
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Bio velouté de potiron & gra... | Velouté de potiron et châtai... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | b |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 33 kcal | 29 kcal |
| Fat | 0.9 g | 0.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.5 g | 0.3 g |
| Sugars | 1.4 g | 1.9 g |
| Salt | 0.6 g | 0.6 g |
| Fiber | 1.1 g | 1.4 g |
| Protein | 0.9 g | 0.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | Gluten, Milk, Nuts |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Velouté de potiron et châtaigne has 33% less fat (0.6 g vs 0.9 g).
- Bio velouté de potiron & graines de courge has 26% less sugar (1.4 g vs 1.9 g).
- Bio velouté de potiron & graines de courge has 44% more protein (0.9 g vs 0.5 g).
- Velouté de potiron et châtaigne is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Velouté de potiron et châtaigne lists: Gluten, Nuts.
Ingredients
Bio velouté de potiron & graines de courge
water, pumpkin 27%, carrot', potato', tomato juice based on concentrate, cream', corn starch, sea salt, squash seeds'0,4%, natural flavour,
Velouté de potiron et châtaigne
Eau,potiron 30%, carotte, pomme de terre, châtaignes 3,2%, purée de tomates, crème fraiche, sel, extrait naturel de poivre
FAQ
Which is healthier: Bio velouté de potiron & graines de courge or Velouté de potiron et châtaigne?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Velouté de potiron et châtaigne has fewer calories: 29 kcal versus 33 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Bio velouté de potiron & graines de courge has less sugar: 1.4 g versus 1.9 g per 100 g.