Vegan topping goût mozzarella vs Reibegenuss
Overall, Vegan topping goût mozzarella has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Vegan topping goût mozzarell... | Reibegenuss |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 276 kcal | 284 kcal |
| Fat | 22.5 g | 21 g |
| Saturated fat | 13.7 g | 18 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 1.9 g | 2.2 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 0 g | 3.2 g |
| Additives | 3 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | Nuts, Mandelprotein |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Vegan topping goût mozzarella has 24% less saturated fat (13.7 g vs 18 g).
- Vegan topping goût mozzarella has no sugar, while Reibegenuss has 0.5 g.
- Vegan topping goût mozzarella has 14% less salt (1.9 g vs 2.2 g).
- Reibegenuss has 100% more protein (3.2 g vs 0 g).
- Only Reibegenuss lists: Nuts, Mandelprotein.
Ingredients
Vegan topping goût mozzarella
Eau, 20% amidon de pomme de terre modifié, 16% huile de coco, 8% huile de colza, 2% amidon de pomme de terre, sel, colorant: caroténoïdes, conservateur : sorbate de potassium , correcteur d'acidité: acide lactique , arôme,
Reibegenuss
52% Mandelerzeugnis (Trinkwasser, 7% _Mandelprotein_, 2% _Mandeln_), Stärke, Kokosöl, Salz, Aroma, Sonnenblumenprotein, färbendes Lebensmittel (Konzentrat aus Karotte und Apfel), Antioxidationsmittel: Natriumascorbat
FAQ
Which is healthier: Vegan topping goût mozzarella or Reibegenuss?
Overall, Vegan topping goût mozzarella has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Vegan topping goût mozzarella has fewer calories: 276 kcal versus 284 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Vegan topping goût mozzarella has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.