Comparison
Vegan protine powder vs Rocka
Overall, Rocka has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Vegan protine powder | Rocka |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 361 kcal | 383 kcal |
| Fat | 8.3 g | 5.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.8 g | 1.4 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 2.4 g |
| Salt | 2.9 g | 2.2 g |
| Fiber | 8.3 g | 5.6 g |
| Protein | 69.4 g | 72 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Rocka has 32% less fat (5.7 g vs 8.3 g).
- Rocka has 50% less saturated fat (1.4 g vs 2.8 g).
- Vegan protine powder has no sugar, while Rocka has 2.4 g.
- Rocka has 25% less salt (2.2 g vs 2.9 g).
- Vegan protine powder has 33% more fiber (8.3 g vs 5.6 g).
Ingredients
Vegan protine powder
Not available.
Rocka
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Vegan protine powder or Rocka?
Overall, Rocka has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Vegan protine powder has fewer calories: 361 kcal versus 383 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Vegan protine powder has less sugar: 0 g versus 2.4 g per 100 g.