Comparison

Uncured hard salami vs Csikós csípős szürkemarha szalámi

Overall, Uncured hard salami has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientUncured hard salamiCsikós csípős szürkemarha sz...
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 393 kcal 495 kcal
Fat 32.1 g 45 g
Saturated fat 12.5 g 18 g
Sugars 3.6 g 0.8 g
Salt 4.2 g 3.5 g
Protein 21.4 g 21 g
Additives02
AllergensBeef, Celery, PorkNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Uncured hard salami has 21% fewer calories (393 kcal vs 495 kcal).
  • Uncured hard salami has 29% less fat (32.1 g vs 45 g).
  • Uncured hard salami has 31% less saturated fat (12.5 g vs 18 g).
  • Csikós csípős szürkemarha szalámi has 78% less sugar (0.8 g vs 3.6 g).
  • Csikós csípős szürkemarha szalámi has 17% less salt (3.5 g vs 4.2 g).
  • Only Uncured hard salami lists: Beef, Celery, Pork.

Ingredients

Uncured hard salami

PORK, BEEF, SALT, CANE SUGAR, CONTAINS 2% OR LESS OF NATURAL FLAVORS, NATURAL SMOKE FLAVOR, CULTURED CELERY JUICE, SEA SALT, SPICE, LACTIC ACID STARTER CULTURE, GARLIC POWDER.

Csikós csípős szürkemarha szalámi

Szürkemarhahús, sertéshús, szalonna, ékezési só, fűszepaprika (1,0%), chili (0,8%), csipős fűszerpaprika (0,4%), fűszerek, cukor, dextróz, paprikakivonat, anlioxidáns (nátrum-aszkorbát), fűszerkivonalok, tarlósítószer (nátrium-nitrit), starterkultúra.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Uncured hard salami or Csikós csípős szürkemarha szalámi?

Overall, Uncured hard salami has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Uncured hard salami has fewer calories: 393 kcal versus 495 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Csikós csípős szürkemarha szalámi has less sugar: 0.8 g versus 3.6 g per 100 g.

More comparisons