Twibio fourrés myrtille vs Cuor di Bosco
Overall, Cuor di Bosco has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 0.
Twibio fourrés myrtille
Cuor di Bosco
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Twibio fourrés myrtille | Cuor di Bosco |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 444 kcal | 394 kcal |
| Fat | 12 g | 12 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.3 g | 2.8 g |
| Sugars | 50 g | 30 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0.3 g |
| Fiber | 3.3 g | 3.9 g |
| Protein | 4.4 g | 5.6 g |
| Additives | 1 | 7 |
| Allergens | Gluten, Avoine | Eggs, Gluten, Milk, Farina di frumento |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Cuor di Bosco has 11% fewer calories (394 kcal vs 444 kcal).
- Cuor di Bosco has 15% less saturated fat (2.8 g vs 3.3 g).
- Cuor di Bosco has 40% less sugar (30 g vs 50 g).
- Cuor di Bosco has 15% more fiber (3.9 g vs 3.3 g).
- Cuor di Bosco has 21% more protein (5.6 g vs 4.4 g).
- Cuor di Bosco has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Twibio fourrés myrtille lists: Avoine.
- Only Cuor di Bosco lists: Eggs, Milk, Farina di frumento.
Ingredients
Twibio fourrés myrtille
Purée de pomme* (61%), farine de blé* T65 (37%), sucre non raffiné*, sirop de glucose, purée de myrtille* (9,5%), huile de tounesol*, sirop de blé*, beurre de cacao*, jus concentré de citron*, arôme naturel de myrtille* (0,4%), poudre à lever: carbonates de sodium, fibre d'avoine*.
Cuor di Bosco
Farina di frumento 44,7%, farcitura ai frutti di bosco e amarena 30%* (zucchero, purea di lamponi 4,8%*, purea di mirtilli 3,3%*, purea di amarene 2,4%*, fibra di mais, gelificante: pectina, succo concentrato di limone e sambuco, aromi naturali), zucchero, olio di girasole, burro, uova fresche, latte scremato in polvere, sciroppo di fruttosio-glucosio, agenti lievitanti (carbonato acido d'ammonio, carbonato acido di sodio, tartrato monopotassico), aromi, sale.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Twibio fourrés myrtille or Cuor di Bosco?
Overall, Cuor di Bosco has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Cuor di Bosco has fewer calories: 394 kcal versus 444 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Cuor di Bosco has less sugar: 30 g versus 50 g per 100 g.