Tripes à la mode de caen vs Tripes à la mode de Caen pot en verre 600g
Overall, Tripes à la mode de caen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Tripes à la mode de caen
Tripes à la mode de Caen pot en verre 600g
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Tripes à la mode de caen | Tripes à la mode de Caen pot... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 82 kcal | 99 kcal |
| Fat | 1.6 g | 3.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.6 g | 1.5 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 1.1 g | 1 g |
| Fiber | 1.4 g | 1.1 g |
| Protein | 16 g | 17 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Tripes à la mode de caen has 17% fewer calories (82 kcal vs 99 kcal).
- Tripes à la mode de caen has 48% less fat (1.6 g vs 3.1 g).
- Tripes à la mode de caen has 60% less saturated fat (0.6 g vs 1.5 g).
Ingredients
Tripes à la mode de caen
Not available.
Tripes à la mode de Caen pot en verre 600g
Estomacs et pieds de boeuf (origine : France) 76%, eau, oignons, carottes 4,3%, sel, calvados 0,4%, extraits d'épices, laurier. Pourcentage des ingrédients mis en oeuvre à la fabrication. Traces éventuelles de gluten, oeuf, lait, céleri, moutarde.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Tripes à la mode de caen or Tripes à la mode de Caen pot en verre 600g?
Overall, Tripes à la mode de caen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Tripes à la mode de caen has fewer calories: 82 kcal versus 99 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Tripes à la mode de caen has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.