Tripes à la mode de Caen vs Tripes à la mode de caen
Overall, Tripes à la mode de caen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Tripes à la mode de Caen | Tripes à la mode de caen |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | a |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 81 kcal | 82 kcal |
| Fat | 2.5 g | 1.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.2 g | 0.6 g |
| Sugars | 0.1 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 1 g | 1.1 g |
| Fiber | — | 1.4 g |
| Protein | 14 g | 16 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Tripes à la mode de caen has 36% less fat (1.6 g vs 2.5 g).
- Tripes à la mode de caen has 50% less saturated fat (0.6 g vs 1.2 g).
- Tripes à la mode de Caen has 80% less sugar (0.1 g vs 0.5 g).
- Tripes à la mode de caen has 13% more protein (16 g vs 14 g).
- Tripes à la mode de caen has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Tripes à la mode de Caen
Tripes de bovins 53% (panses, bonnets, feuillets, caillettes de bovins en proportions naturelles), eau, pieds de bovins désossés 6%, oignons 6%, carottes 6%, Calvados 1%, sel, épices, plantes aromatiques, arôme naturel, colorant: caramel ordinaire. Traces éventuelles de céleri.
Tripes à la mode de caen
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Tripes à la mode de Caen or Tripes à la mode de caen?
Overall, Tripes à la mode de caen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Tripes à la mode de Caen has fewer calories: 81 kcal versus 82 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Tripes à la mode de Caen has less sugar: 0.1 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.