Comparison

Tripes vs Tricandilles

Overall, Tripes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientTripesTricandilles
Nutri-Score b e
NOVA group 4 3
Calories 103 kcal 234 kcal
Fat 3.8 g 20 g
Saturated fat 2.1 g 9.5 g
Sugars 0.5 g 0 g
Salt 1 g 2.5 g
Fiber — 0 g
Protein 17 g 13 g
Additives11
AllergensSulphur dioxide and sulphitesNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Tripes has 56% fewer calories (103 kcal vs 234 kcal).
  • Tripes has 81% less fat (3.8 g vs 20 g).
  • Tripes has 78% less saturated fat (2.1 g vs 9.5 g).
  • Tricandilles has no sugar, while Tripes has 0.5 g.
  • Tripes has 60% less salt (1 g vs 2.5 g).
  • Tripes has 24% more protein (17 g vs 13 g).
  • Tripes has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Tricandilles is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Tripes lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.

Ingredients

Tripes

Panse de bœuf français (71%), oignons, carottes, gélatine de porc vin blanc SULFITES), poireau, sel, poivre.

Tricandilles

Chaudins de porc origine Espagne, conservateur E250, vinaigre, persil.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Tripes or Tricandilles?

Overall, Tripes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Tripes has fewer calories: 103 kcal versus 234 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Tricandilles has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons