Trio de noix vs La vache qui rit 16 p origianl
Overall, La vache qui rit 16 p origianl has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Trio de noix | La vache qui rit 16 p origia... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 402 kcal | 223 kcal |
| Fat | 40 g | 18.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 25 g | 12.6 g |
| Sugars | 2.2 g | 5.7 g |
| Salt | 1 g | 0.9 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 8.3 g | 12.6 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | Celery, Milk, Nuts | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- La vache qui rit 16 p origianl has 45% fewer calories (223 kcal vs 402 kcal).
- La vache qui rit 16 p origianl has 53% less fat (18.9 g vs 40 g).
- La vache qui rit 16 p origianl has 50% less saturated fat (12.6 g vs 25 g).
- Trio de noix has 61% less sugar (2.2 g vs 5.7 g).
- La vache qui rit 16 p origianl has 34% more protein (12.6 g vs 8.3 g).
- Only Trio de noix lists: Celery, Nuts.
Ingredients
Trio de noix
LAIT 67% et CRÈME 23% pasteurisés (origine : France), NOIX DE PÉCAN 4%, ferments LACTIQUES, sel, NOIX 0,5%, NOIX DE CAJOU 0,5%, arôme naturel, conservateur : sorbate de potassium.
La vache qui rit 16 p origianl
حليب خالي من الدسم, مادة جافة, جبنة, زبدة, أملاح مستحلبة, بوليفوسفات الصوديوم, فوسفات الكالسيوم, حمض الستريك, ملح الطعام, مادة حافظة, سوربات البوتاسيوم, ملح, بوليفوسفات الصوديوم, غلوكونات الزنك, فيتامين D
FAQ
Which is healthier: Trio de noix or La vache qui rit 16 p origianl?
Overall, La vache qui rit 16 p origianl has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
La vache qui rit 16 p origianl has fewer calories: 223 kcal versus 402 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Trio de noix has less sugar: 2.2 g versus 5.7 g per 100 g.