Tricandilles vs Tripes du sauget au vin d'arbois
Overall, Tripes du sauget au vin d'arbois has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 2.
Tricandilles
Tripes du sauget au vin d'arbois
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Tricandilles | Tripes du sauget au vin d'ar... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 234 kcal | 76 kcal |
| Fat | 20 g | 1.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 9.5 g | 0.9 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.7 g |
| Salt | 2.5 g | 0.8 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 13 g | 10.3 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Tripes du sauget au vin d'arbois has 68% fewer calories (76 kcal vs 234 kcal).
- Tripes du sauget au vin d'arbois has 91% less fat (1.8 g vs 20 g).
- Tripes du sauget au vin d'arbois has 91% less saturated fat (0.9 g vs 9.5 g).
- Tricandilles has no sugar, while Tripes du sauget au vin d'arbois has 0.7 g.
- Tripes du sauget au vin d'arbois has 68% less salt (0.8 g vs 2.5 g).
- Tricandilles has 21% more protein (13 g vs 10.3 g).
- Tripes du sauget au vin d'arbois has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Tricandilles
Chaudins de porc origine Espagne, conservateur E250, vinaigre, persil.
Tripes du sauget au vin d'arbois
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Tricandilles or Tripes du sauget au vin d'arbois?
Overall, Tripes du sauget au vin d'arbois has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Tripes du sauget au vin d'arbois has fewer calories: 76 kcal versus 234 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Tricandilles has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.7 g per 100 g.