Tradition cremeux vs Passendale Lightesse
Overall, Passendale Lightesse has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Tradition cremeux | Passendale Lightesse |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | c |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 334 kcal | 251 kcal |
| Fat | 27 g | 15 g |
| Saturated fat | 18 g | 11 g |
| Sugars | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 1.8 g | 1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 21 g | 29 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Passendale Lightesse has 25% fewer calories (251 kcal vs 334 kcal).
- Passendale Lightesse has 44% less fat (15 g vs 27 g).
- Passendale Lightesse has 39% less saturated fat (11 g vs 18 g).
- Passendale Lightesse has 44% less salt (1 g vs 1.8 g).
- Passendale Lightesse has 28% more protein (29 g vs 21 g).
- Passendale Lightesse has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Passendale Lightesse lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Tradition cremeux
(ii) maredsous abbaye valeurs nutritionnelles moyennes average nutritional values valeur énergétique/ energie matières grasses/vet dont acides gras saturés / of which saturated fatty acids glucides/carbohydrates dont sucres/ of which sugars protéines / proteins sel/zout calcium fr 5,119,002) ce abbey bel for all for good pour 100 g per 100 g 1385 kj (
Passendale Lightesse
pasteurized cow's milk, salt, lactic ferments, natural renure: rocou,
FAQ
Which is healthier: Tradition cremeux or Passendale Lightesse?
Overall, Passendale Lightesse has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Passendale Lightesse has fewer calories: 251 kcal versus 334 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Passendale Lightesse has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.1 g per 100 g.