Tourte au riesling vs Tourte pintade cèpes et girolles
Overall, Tourte au riesling has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Tourte au riesling | Tourte pintade cèpes et giro... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 283 kcal | 288 kcal |
| Fat | 18 g | 20 g |
| Saturated fat | 10 g | 9.9 g |
| Sugars | 0.9 g | 1.9 g |
| Salt | 1.1 g | 1.2 g |
| Fiber | — | 2.2 g |
| Protein | 12 g | 5.9 g |
| Additives | 0 | 3 |
| Allergens | None listed | Eggs, Gluten, Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Tourte au riesling has 10% less fat (18 g vs 20 g).
- Tourte au riesling has 53% less sugar (0.9 g vs 1.9 g).
- Tourte au riesling has 51% more protein (12 g vs 5.9 g).
- Only Tourte pintade cèpes et girolles lists: Eggs, Gluten, Milk.
Ingredients
Tourte au riesling
Not available.
Tourte pintade cèpes et girolles
Farine de blé, margarine végétale (huiles végétales (palme, colza), graisses végétales (palme, colza); eau, sel, émulsifiant : mono - et diglycérides d'acides gras ; acidifiant : acide citrique), eau, 9,2% viande de pintade (9,1% viande de pintade (Origine : France), sel), 5,8% brisures de cèpes, 5,8% brisures de girolles, 5,8% crème fraîche légère (lait), échalotes, 1,6% Porto blanc modifié (Porto blanc, arôme naturel de poivre), amidon modifié de pomme de terre, 0,9% ail, sel, œufs entiers, 0,3% persil, poivre blanc.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Tourte au riesling or Tourte pintade cèpes et girolles?
Overall, Tourte au riesling has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Tourte au riesling has fewer calories: 283 kcal versus 288 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Tourte au riesling has less sugar: 0.9 g versus 1.9 g per 100 g.