Comparison

Tielles sétoises A l'encornet géant* et tomates vs Tourte au riesling

Overall, Tielles sétoises A l'encornet géant* et tomates has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientTielles sétoises A l'encorne...Tourte au riesling
Nutri-Score c d
NOVA group 3 —
Calories 301 kcal 283 kcal
Fat 16 g 18 g
Saturated fat 1 g 10 g
Sugars 4 g 0.9 g
Salt 1.1 g 1.1 g
Fiber 2.1 g —
Protein 7.9 g 12 g
Additives00
AllergensGluten, MolluscsNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Tielles sétoises A l'encornet géant* et tomates has 11% less fat (16 g vs 18 g).
  • Tielles sétoises A l'encornet géant* et tomates has 90% less saturated fat (1 g vs 10 g).
  • Tourte au riesling has 78% less sugar (0.9 g vs 4 g).
  • Tourte au riesling has 34% more protein (12 g vs 7.9 g).
  • Tielles sétoises A l'encornet géant* et tomates has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Tielles sétoises A l'encornet géant* et tomates lists: Gluten, Molluscs.

Ingredients

Tielles sétoises A l'encornet géant* et tomates

Farine de _blé_ (origine France) 30% , eau, encornet géant (pêché en océan Pacifique Sud-Est) 22% (_mollusque_), huile de colza, double concentré de tomate (origine France) 8%, ail, sel, levure, plantes aromatiques, épices. Peut contenir des traces de crustacés, poisson, céleri, lait et œuf.

Tourte au riesling

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Tielles sétoises A l'encornet géant* et tomates or Tourte au riesling?

Overall, Tielles sétoises A l'encornet géant* et tomates has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Tourte au riesling has fewer calories: 283 kcal versus 301 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Tourte au riesling has less sugar: 0.9 g versus 4 g per 100 g.

More comparisons