Tortilla Nachos Original vs Tortilla chips
Overall, Tortilla chips has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Tortilla Nachos Original | Tortilla chips |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | b |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 483 kcal | 483 kcal |
| Fat | 23.7 g | 22.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.3 g | 2 g |
| Sugars | 0.7 g | 1.5 g |
| Salt | 0.5 g | 0.4 g |
| Fiber | 6 g | 6.5 g |
| Protein | 7.7 g | 8 g |
| Additives | 0 | 4 |
| Allergens | None listed | Celery, Mustard, Sesame seeds |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Tortilla chips has 14% less saturated fat (2 g vs 2.3 g).
- Tortilla Nachos Original has 55% less sugar (0.7 g vs 1.5 g).
- Tortilla chips has the better Nutri-Score.
- Tortilla Nachos Original is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Tortilla chips lists: Celery, Mustard, Sesame seeds.
Ingredients
Tortilla Nachos Original
whole corn kernels, high oleic sunflower oil, salt.
Tortilla chips
grain de maïs, huile de tournesol riche en acide oléïque, sucre, sel de cuisine, oignon en poudre, épices (paprika, poivre noir curcuma, gingembre, piment de cayenne), maltodextrine, extrait de levure, arômes, correcteurs d'acidité (acide citrique, acétate de sodium), ail, persil, colorant: extrait de paprika). Conditionnées sous mosphère protectrice. Peut contenir des ingrédients à base de lait, soja, moutarde, graines de sésame,céleri
FAQ
Which is healthier: Tortilla Nachos Original or Tortilla chips?
Overall, Tortilla chips has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Tortilla Nachos Original has fewer calories: 483 kcal versus 483 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Tortilla Nachos Original has less sugar: 0.7 g versus 1.5 g per 100 g.