Comparison

Tomme de chevre vs Flore di Macchia (31 % MG)

Overall, Flore di Macchia (31 % MG) has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientTomme de chevreFlore di Macchia (31 % MG)
Nutri-Score d a
NOVA group — 3
Calories 416 kcal 35 kcal
Fat 37 g 0.2 g
Saturated fat 27 g 0.1 g
Sugars 0 g 4.9 g
Salt 2 g 0.1 g
Fiber — 0 g
Protein 20 g 3.3 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedMilk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Flore di Macchia (31 % MG) has 92% fewer calories (35 kcal vs 416 kcal).
  • Flore di Macchia (31 % MG) has 99% less fat (0.2 g vs 37 g).
  • Flore di Macchia (31 % MG) has 100% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 27 g).
  • Tomme de chevre has no sugar, while Flore di Macchia (31 % MG) has 4.9 g.
  • Flore di Macchia (31 % MG) has 95% less salt (0.1 g vs 2 g).
  • Tomme de chevre has 84% more protein (20 g vs 3.3 g).
  • Flore di Macchia (31 % MG) has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Flore di Macchia (31 % MG) lists: Milk.

Ingredients

Tomme de chevre

Not available.

Flore di Macchia (31 % MG)

Lait de brebis (85 %), lait de chèvre (15 %) pasteurisés, présure, sel.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Tomme de chevre or Flore di Macchia (31 % MG)?

Overall, Flore di Macchia (31 % MG) has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Flore di Macchia (31 % MG) has fewer calories: 35 kcal versus 416 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Tomme de chevre has less sugar: 0 g versus 4.9 g per 100 g.

More comparisons