Comparison

La Tomme de chèvre vs Flore di Macchia (31 % MG)

Overall, Flore di Macchia (31 % MG) has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientLa Tomme de chèvreFlore di Macchia (31 % MG)
Nutri-Score d a
NOVA group 4 3
Calories 362 kcal 35 kcal
Fat 30 g 0.2 g
Saturated fat 21 g 0.1 g
Sugars 0.5 g 4.9 g
Salt 1.4 g 0.1 g
Fiber 0 g 0 g
Protein 23 g 3.3 g
Additives30
AllergensEggs, MilkMilk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Flore di Macchia (31 % MG) has 90% fewer calories (35 kcal vs 362 kcal).
  • Flore di Macchia (31 % MG) has 99% less fat (0.2 g vs 30 g).
  • Flore di Macchia (31 % MG) has 99% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 21 g).
  • La Tomme de chèvre has 90% less sugar (0.5 g vs 4.9 g).
  • Flore di Macchia (31 % MG) has 92% less salt (0.1 g vs 1.4 g).
  • La Tomme de chèvre has 86% more protein (23 g vs 3.3 g).
  • Flore di Macchia (31 % MG) has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Flore di Macchia (31 % MG) is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only La Tomme de chèvre lists: Eggs.

Ingredients

La Tomme de chèvre

lait de chèvre pasteurisé (Origine France), sel, ferments, conservateur : lysozyme trait de blanc d'œuf), colorants : rocou, caramel.

Flore di Macchia (31 % MG)

Lait de brebis (85 %), lait de chèvre (15 %) pasteurisés, présure, sel.

FAQ

Which is healthier: La Tomme de chèvre or Flore di Macchia (31 % MG)?

Overall, Flore di Macchia (31 % MG) has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Flore di Macchia (31 % MG) has fewer calories: 35 kcal versus 362 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

La Tomme de chèvre has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 4.9 g per 100 g.

More comparisons