Tomme de chevre vs Flore di Macchia (31 % MG)
Overall, Flore di Macchia (31 % MG) has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Tomme de chevre | Flore di Macchia (31 % MG) |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 405 kcal | 35 kcal |
| Fat | 33 g | 0.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 24 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 4.9 g |
| Salt | 1.7 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 24 g | 3.3 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Flore di Macchia (31 % MG) has 91% fewer calories (35 kcal vs 405 kcal).
- Flore di Macchia (31 % MG) has 99% less fat (0.2 g vs 33 g).
- Flore di Macchia (31 % MG) has 100% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 24 g).
- Tomme de chevre has no sugar, while Flore di Macchia (31 % MG) has 4.9 g.
- Flore di Macchia (31 % MG) has 94% less salt (0.1 g vs 1.7 g).
- Tomme de chevre has 86% more protein (24 g vs 3.3 g).
- Flore di Macchia (31 % MG) has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Tomme de chevre
Lait de chèvre : E1105(0EUFS)
Flore di Macchia (31 % MG)
Lait de brebis (85 %), lait de chèvre (15 %) pasteurisés, présure, sel.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Tomme de chevre or Flore di Macchia (31 % MG)?
Overall, Flore di Macchia (31 % MG) has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Flore di Macchia (31 % MG) has fewer calories: 35 kcal versus 405 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Tomme de chevre has less sugar: 0 g versus 4.9 g per 100 g.