Tomates séchées au soleil vs Raisins Secs
Overall, Tomates séchées au soleil has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Tomates séchées au soleil | Raisins Secs |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 166 kcal | 331 kcal |
| Fat | 9.5 g | 0.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.1 g | 0.3 g |
| Sugars | 5.8 g | 61 g |
| Salt | 2.5 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 6.4 g | 5 g |
| Protein | 3.7 g | 3.1 g |
| Additives | 2 | 0 |
| Allergens | Sulphur dioxide and sulphites | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Tomates séchées au soleil has 50% fewer calories (166 kcal vs 331 kcal).
- Raisins Secs has 91% less fat (0.9 g vs 9.5 g).
- Raisins Secs has 73% less saturated fat (0.3 g vs 1.1 g).
- Tomates séchées au soleil has 90% less sugar (5.8 g vs 61 g).
- Raisins Secs has 99% less salt (0 g vs 2.5 g).
- Tomates séchées au soleil has 22% more fiber (6.4 g vs 5 g).
- Tomates séchées au soleil has 16% more protein (3.7 g vs 3.1 g).
- Tomates séchées au soleil has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Tomates séchées au soleil lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.
Ingredients
Tomates séchées au soleil
Tomates séchées 59%, huile de tournesol 36%, ail, sel, vinaigre de vin (contient _sulfites_), origan 0,2%, poivre noir, acidifiant : acide lactique, antioxydant : acide ascorbique.
Raisins Secs
Raisins secs 99,5%, huile végétale.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Tomates séchées au soleil or Raisins Secs?
Overall, Tomates séchées au soleil has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Tomates séchées au soleil has fewer calories: 166 kcal versus 331 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Tomates séchées au soleil has less sugar: 5.8 g versus 61 g per 100 g.