Tomates farcies vs Tomates farcies
Overall, Tomates farcies has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Tomates farcies | Tomates farcies |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 125 kcal | 150 kcal |
| Fat | 9.6 g | 12 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.9 g | 4.5 g |
| Sugars | 1.7 g | 1.7 g |
| Salt | 0.8 g | 0.8 g |
| Fiber | — | 0.8 g |
| Protein | 8 g | 5.9 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Tomates farcies has 17% fewer calories (125 kcal vs 150 kcal).
- Tomates farcies has 20% less fat (9.6 g vs 12 g).
- Tomates farcies has 13% less saturated fat (3.9 g vs 4.5 g).
- Tomates farcies has 26% more protein (8 g vs 5.9 g).
Ingredients
Tomates farcies
Not available.
Tomates farcies
54% tomate, 34% viande de porc (origine : France), eau, gras de porc, sel, dextrose, farine de riz, farine de pois chiche, 0,91% fibres végétales (bambou, plantain), arômes naturels, amidon de maïs, plantes aromatiques, épices, ail, betterave, muscade, oignon.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Tomates farcies or Tomates farcies?
Overall, Tomates farcies has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Tomates farcies has fewer calories: 125 kcal versus 150 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Tomates farcies has less sugar: 1.7 g versus 1.7 g per 100 g.