Comparison

Tomates farcies vs Tomates farcies

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientTomates farciesTomates farcies
Nutri-Score c c
NOVA group — 4
Calories 125 kcal 149 kcal
Fat 9.6 g 7.5 g
Saturated fat 3.9 g 1.8 g
Sugars 1.7 g 1.6 g
Salt 0.8 g 0.9 g
Fiber — 1.1 g
Protein 8 g 4.8 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Tomates farcies has 16% fewer calories (125 kcal vs 149 kcal).
  • Tomates farcies has 22% less fat (7.5 g vs 9.6 g).
  • Tomates farcies has 54% less saturated fat (1.8 g vs 3.9 g).
  • Tomates farcies has 40% more protein (8 g vs 4.8 g).

Ingredients

Tomates farcies

Not available.

Tomates farcies

Tomates fraiches 34%, eau, viande et gras de porc 16% , riz 13% , Oignon préfrit 5,6% (oignon, huile de tournesol, oignon 4,4%, huile de colza, sel concentré de tomates 0,4 %, persil 0,4%, arôme naturel, ail, fond blanc de veau (arômes naturels, sel maltodextrine, fécule de pomme de terre, plantes aromatiques, viande de veau), poivre, thym.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Tomates farcies or Tomates farcies?

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Tomates farcies has fewer calories: 125 kcal versus 149 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Tomates farcies has less sugar: 1.6 g versus 1.7 g per 100 g.

More comparisons