Comparison
Tomates farcies vs Tomates farcies
Overall, Tomates farcies has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Tomates farcies | Tomates farcies |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | b |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 125 kcal | 77 kcal |
| Fat | 9.6 g | 4.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.9 g | 1.4 g |
| Sugars | 1.7 g | 2.1 g |
| Salt | 0.8 g | 0.5 g |
| Fiber | — | 1.5 g |
| Protein | 8 g | 5.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Tomates farcies has 38% fewer calories (77 kcal vs 125 kcal).
- Tomates farcies has 51% less fat (4.7 g vs 9.6 g).
- Tomates farcies has 64% less saturated fat (1.4 g vs 3.9 g).
- Tomates farcies has 19% less sugar (1.7 g vs 2.1 g).
- Tomates farcies has 31% more protein (8 g vs 5.5 g).
- Tomates farcies has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Tomates farcies
Not available.
Tomates farcies
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Tomates farcies or Tomates farcies?
Overall, Tomates farcies has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Tomates farcies has fewer calories: 77 kcal versus 125 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Tomates farcies has less sugar: 1.7 g versus 2.1 g per 100 g.