Comparison

Tomates farcies vs Tomates farcies

Overall, Tomates farcies has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientTomates farciesTomates farcies
Nutri-Score c b
NOVA group 4 —
Calories 149 kcal 77 kcal
Fat 7.5 g 4.7 g
Saturated fat 1.8 g 1.4 g
Sugars 1.6 g 2.1 g
Salt 0.9 g 0.5 g
Fiber 1.1 g 1.5 g
Protein 4.8 g 5.5 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Tomates farcies has 48% fewer calories (77 kcal vs 149 kcal).
  • Tomates farcies has 37% less fat (4.7 g vs 7.5 g).
  • Tomates farcies has 22% less saturated fat (1.4 g vs 1.8 g).
  • Tomates farcies has 24% less sugar (1.6 g vs 2.1 g).
  • Tomates farcies has 44% less salt (0.5 g vs 0.9 g).
  • Tomates farcies has 27% more fiber (1.5 g vs 1.1 g).
  • Tomates farcies has 13% more protein (5.5 g vs 4.8 g).
  • Tomates farcies has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Tomates farcies

Tomates fraiches 34%, eau, viande et gras de porc 16% , riz 13% , Oignon préfrit 5,6% (oignon, huile de tournesol, oignon 4,4%, huile de colza, sel concentré de tomates 0,4 %, persil 0,4%, arôme naturel, ail, fond blanc de veau (arômes naturels, sel maltodextrine, fécule de pomme de terre, plantes aromatiques, viande de veau), poivre, thym.

Tomates farcies

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Tomates farcies or Tomates farcies?

Overall, Tomates farcies has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Tomates farcies has fewer calories: 77 kcal versus 149 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Tomates farcies has less sugar: 1.6 g versus 2.1 g per 100 g.

More comparisons