Tomates allongées en grappe vs Wokgroenten met chilipeper
Overall, Tomates allongées en grappe has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Tomates allongées en grappe | Wokgroenten met chilipeper |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | — | 1 |
| Calories | 14 kcal | 29 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 1.9 g | 3.6 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 2.7 g |
| Protein | 0.9 g | 1.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Tomates allongées en grappe has 52% fewer calories (14 kcal vs 29 kcal).
- Tomates allongées en grappe has 47% less sugar (1.9 g vs 3.6 g).
- Wokgroenten met chilipeper has 40% more protein (1.5 g vs 0.9 g).
Ingredients
Tomates allongées en grappe
Not available.
Wokgroenten met chilipeper
witte kool 31%, prei 24%, groene paprika 21%, rode ui 21%, chilipeper 3,1%
FAQ
Which is healthier: Tomates allongées en grappe or Wokgroenten met chilipeper?
Overall, Tomates allongées en grappe has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Tomates allongées en grappe has fewer calories: 14 kcal versus 29 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Tomates allongées en grappe has less sugar: 1.9 g versus 3.6 g per 100 g.