Tilsiter vs Gouda jung in Scheiben
Overall, Tilsiter has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Tilsiter | Gouda jung in Scheiben |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 339 kcal | 341 kcal |
| Fat | 26 g | 27.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 17.9 g | 19.3 g |
| Sugars | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 2 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 25 g | 23.1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Tilsiter has no salt, while Gouda jung in Scheiben has 2 g.
- Tilsiter has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Tilsiter
pasteurisierte Kuhmilch, Speisesalz, Kâsereikulturen, mikrobielles Lab. Unter Schutzatmosphâre verpackt.
Gouda jung in Scheiben
Pasteurisierte MILCH, Speisesalz, Käsereikulturen (enthalten MILCH), mikrobieller Labaustauschstoff.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Tilsiter or Gouda jung in Scheiben?
Overall, Tilsiter has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Tilsiter has fewer calories: 339 kcal versus 341 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Gouda jung in Scheiben has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.1 g per 100 g.