Thomy Meerrettich vs Wasabi Meerrettich
Overall, Thomy Meerrettich has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Thomy Meerrettich | Wasabi Meerrettich |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 210 kcal | 338 kcal |
| Fat | 16 g | 27.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 1 g | 3.1 g |
| Sugars | 7 g | 13.5 g |
| Salt | — | 0.8 g |
| Protein | 3 g | 4.3 g |
| Additives | 3 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk, Mustard | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Thomy Meerrettich has 38% fewer calories (210 kcal vs 338 kcal).
- Thomy Meerrettich has 42% less fat (16 g vs 27.6 g).
- Thomy Meerrettich has 68% less saturated fat (1 g vs 3.1 g).
- Thomy Meerrettich has 48% less sugar (7 g vs 13.5 g).
- Wasabi Meerrettich has 30% more protein (4.3 g vs 3 g).
- Only Thomy Meerrettich lists: Milk, Mustard.
Ingredients
Thomy Meerrettich
Meerrettich, Branntweinessig, Rapsöl, Zucker, MOLKENERZEUGNIS, Jodsalz, Sauerungsmittel Citronensäure, modifizierte Stärke, Verdickungsmittel Xanthan, Aromen (mit SENF), Antioxidationsmittel NATRIUMMETABISULFIT [SPUREN: EIER, SOJA].
Wasabi Meerrettich
Meerretich gerieben, Rapsöl Sahne (25%), Branntweinessig Zacker,Mlkenerzeugnis, Waser, Jodsalz, Wasabipuler, Karamel ackersiup, Sauerungsmitel: Citronensiure, Verickungsmittel Nandhan und Guarkernmehl, Aroma, Farbstofe E100 und El41 Andioxidationsmitel: Ascorbinsiure und Natriummetabisulit.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Thomy Meerrettich or Wasabi Meerrettich?
Overall, Thomy Meerrettich has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Thomy Meerrettich has fewer calories: 210 kcal versus 338 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Thomy Meerrettich has less sugar: 7 g versus 13.5 g per 100 g.