Terrine forestière essentiel vs La terrine de pintade au foi de canard
Overall, Terrine forestière essentiel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Terrine forestière essentiel
La terrine de pintade au foi de canard
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Terrine forestière essentiel | La terrine de pintade au foi... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 253 kcal | 262 kcal |
| Fat | 19 g | 21 g |
| Saturated fat | 6.3 g | 7.8 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 1.3 g |
| Salt | 1.6 g | 1.2 g |
| Fiber | 0.6 g | — |
| Protein | 17 g | 15 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Terrine forestière essentiel has 19% less saturated fat (6.3 g vs 7.8 g).
- Terrine forestière essentiel has 62% less sugar (0.5 g vs 1.3 g).
- La terrine de pintade au foi de canard has 25% less salt (1.2 g vs 1.6 g).
- Terrine forestière essentiel has 12% more protein (17 g vs 15 g).
Ingredients
Terrine forestière essentiel
Viande de porc, lard, foie de poulet 18%, champignons 5% (oreilles de Judas, bolets, cornes d'abondance), sel de cuisine, bouillons de légumes (jus concentrẻ de côtes de bette, jus concentré de carottes), épices, plantes aromatiques, arôme naturel, fécule de pommes de terre, jus concentré d'acérola.
La terrine de pintade au foi de canard
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Terrine forestière essentiel or La terrine de pintade au foi de canard?
Overall, Terrine forestière essentiel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Terrine forestière essentiel has fewer calories: 253 kcal versus 262 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Terrine forestière essentiel has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 1.3 g per 100 g.