Comparison

Terrine d'Oie à la Colombelle vs La terrine de pintade au foi de canard

Overall, La terrine de pintade au foi de canard has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientTerrine d'Oie à la Colombell...La terrine de pintade au foi...
Nutri-Score e d
NOVA group 4 —
Calories 371 kcal 262 kcal
Fat 35 g 21 g
Saturated fat 14.2 g 7.8 g
Sugars 0.4 g 1.3 g
Salt 2 g 1.2 g
Protein 12.3 g 15 g
Additives00
AllergensEggsNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • La terrine de pintade au foi de canard has 29% fewer calories (262 kcal vs 371 kcal).
  • La terrine de pintade au foi de canard has 40% less fat (21 g vs 35 g).
  • La terrine de pintade au foi de canard has 45% less saturated fat (7.8 g vs 14.2 g).
  • Terrine d'Oie à la Colombelle has 69% less sugar (0.4 g vs 1.3 g).
  • La terrine de pintade au foi de canard has 40% less salt (1.2 g vs 2 g).
  • La terrine de pintade au foi de canard has 18% more protein (15 g vs 12.3 g).
  • La terrine de pintade au foi de canard has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Terrine d'Oie à la Colombelle lists: Eggs.

Ingredients

Terrine d'Oie à la Colombelle

Viande d'oie (27%), gras de porc, foie de volaille et de porc, _œuf_, Colombelle (3%), sel, fibre de carotte, épices.

La terrine de pintade au foi de canard

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Terrine d'Oie à la Colombelle or La terrine de pintade au foi de canard?

Overall, La terrine de pintade au foi de canard has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

La terrine de pintade au foi de canard has fewer calories: 262 kcal versus 371 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Terrine d'Oie à la Colombelle has less sugar: 0.4 g versus 1.3 g per 100 g.

More comparisons