Terrine de caille à l'armagnac vs Terrine de cailles
Overall, Terrine de caille à l'armagnac has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Terrine de caille à l'armagn... | Terrine de cailles |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 200 kcal | 280 kcal |
| Fat | 15 g | 24 g |
| Saturated fat | 5.8 g | 8.9 g |
| Sugars | 0.2 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 1.7 g | 1.3 g |
| Protein | 15 g | 16 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Terrine de caille à l'armagnac has 29% fewer calories (200 kcal vs 280 kcal).
- Terrine de caille à l'armagnac has 38% less fat (15 g vs 24 g).
- Terrine de caille à l'armagnac has 35% less saturated fat (5.8 g vs 8.9 g).
- Terrine de cailles has 24% less salt (1.3 g vs 1.7 g).
Ingredients
Terrine de caille à l'armagnac
Not available.
Terrine de cailles
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Terrine de caille à l'armagnac or Terrine de cailles?
Overall, Terrine de caille à l'armagnac has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Terrine de caille à l'armagnac has fewer calories: 200 kcal versus 280 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Terrine de cailles has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.2 g per 100 g.