Comparison

Terrine Caille Raison Brunet vs Terrine de caille à l'armagnac

Overall, Terrine de caille à l'armagnac has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientTerrine Caille Raison BrunetTerrine de caille à l'armagn...
Nutri-Score e d
NOVA group — —
Calories 309 kcal 200 kcal
Fat 27.4 g 15 g
Saturated fat 10.5 g 5.8 g
Sugars 1.6 g 0.2 g
Salt 1.7 g 1.7 g
Fiber 0.9 g —
Protein 13.2 g 15 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Terrine de caille à l'armagnac has 35% fewer calories (200 kcal vs 309 kcal).
  • Terrine de caille à l'armagnac has 45% less fat (15 g vs 27.4 g).
  • Terrine de caille à l'armagnac has 45% less saturated fat (5.8 g vs 10.5 g).
  • Terrine de caille à l'armagnac has 88% less sugar (0.2 g vs 1.6 g).
  • Terrine de caille à l'armagnac has 12% more protein (15 g vs 13.2 g).
  • Terrine de caille à l'armagnac has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Terrine Caille Raison Brunet

IRGRÉOIEHTS: Gras de port, foie goulet, foie de porc, yiande de caille 15%, gorge de port, séparée mécaniquement de caille 5%, raisins sel, muscade, poire, Fabriqué en France pafLir : et caille origine UE.

Terrine de caille à l'armagnac

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Terrine Caille Raison Brunet or Terrine de caille à l'armagnac?

Overall, Terrine de caille à l'armagnac has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Terrine de caille à l'armagnac has fewer calories: 200 kcal versus 309 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Terrine de caille à l'armagnac has less sugar: 0.2 g versus 1.6 g per 100 g.

More comparisons